Interactions and clinical implications of serological and respiratory variables 3 months after acute COVID-19.

Medical follow-up of symptomatic patients after acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) results in major burdens on patients and healthcare systems. The value of serological markers as part of this follow-up remains undetermined. We aimed to evaluate the clinical implications of serological markers for follow-up of acute COVID-19. For this purpose, we conducted an observational cohort study of patients 3 months after acute COVID-19. Participants visited a respiratory-clinic between October 2020 and March 2021, and completed pulmonary function tests (PFTs), serological tests, symptom-related questionnaires, and chest CT scans. Overall, 275 patients were included at a median of 82 days (IQR 64-111) post infection. 162 (59%) patients had diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide corrected for hemoglobin (DLCOc) below 80%, and 69 (25%) had bilateral chest abnormalities on CT scan. In multivariate analysis, anti-S levels were an independent predictor for DLCOc (ß = - 0.14, p = 0.036). Anti-S levels were also associated with severe COVID-19 and older age, and correlated with anti-nucleocapsid (r = 0.30, p < 0.001) and antibodies to receptor binding domain (RBD, r = 0.37, p < 0.001). Other serological variables were not associated with clinical outcomes. In conclusion, symptomatic patients 3-months after COVID-19 had high respiratory symptomatic burden, in which anti-S levels were significantly associated with previous severe COVID-19 and DLCOc.

Assessment of a close respiratory follow-up schedule at 3 and 6 months after acute COVID-19 and its related investigations.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory sequela after acute COVID-19 is common and requires medical follow-up. Considering its vast economic impact, there is still no consensus regarding the mid-term follow-up plan after recovery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the necessity of a close pulmonary follow-up schedule after acute COVID-19 and its related investigations. METHODS: A prospective cohort study including adult patients after acute COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were invited or referred to a 3- and 6-month follow-up visits at a large pulmonary institute in a tertiary center. Before each visit, patients completed demographic and clinical questionnaires, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and chest CT scans. RESULTS: 168 patients were included after completing both visits (medians of 80 and 177 days). Their mean age was 58 ± 15 and 52% recovered from severe or critical COVID-19. Between the two visits, there was no change in DLCOc (mean 73 ± 18 %predicted in both visits) and FVC (mean 90 ± 16 vs. 89 ± 16 %predicted). The COPD assessment tool and modified Medical Research Council scale had inverse correlations with the DLCOc, and similarly did not change between the visits. Occupational exposures were the only factor associated with a change in DLCOc during follow-up (3% decrease, p = 0.04). An improvement in chest CT findings at the second visit was not associated with a change in PFTs. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinical variables did not change during a close follow-up schedule in the first six months after acute COVID-19. Such a follow-up plan does not appear necessary and should be personalized to limit excessive costs and resources.

Blood Stream Infections in Burns: A 14-Year Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Blood stream infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in burns, and pathogen identification is important for treatment. This study aims to characterize the microbiology of these infections and the association between the infecting pathogen and the hospitalization course. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study that included records of burn patients treated at the Soroka University Medical Center between 2007-2020. Statistical analysis of demographic and clinical data was performed to explore relationships between burn characteristics and outcomes. Patients with positive blood cultures were divided into four groups: Gram-positive, Gram-negative, mixed-bacterial, and fungal. RESULTS: Of the 2029 burn patients hospitalized, 11.7% had positive blood cultures. The most common pathogens were Candida and Pseudomonas. We found significant differences in ICU admission, need for surgery, and mortality between the infected and non-infected groups (p < 0.001). Pathogen groups differed significantly mean TBSA, ICU admission, need for surgery, and mortality (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed flame (OR 2.84) and electric burns (OR 4.58) were independent risk factors for ICU admission and surgical intervention (p < 0.001). Gram-negative bacterial infection was found to be an independent predictor of mortality (OR = 9.29, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Anticipating specific pathogens which are associated with certain burn characteristics may help guide future therapy.